









 |
Thailand energy sector: policy profile
Energy
Sector Management in Thailand
The
energy sector in Thailand is managed by the National Energy Policy Council
(NEPC), the central authoritative body for the establishment of the
national energy policies. It
has been established under the National Energy Policy Council Act, B.E.
2535 (1992), with the Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) acting as
the Secretariat. To enhance
efficient energy sector management, the Committee on Energy Policy
Administration (CEPA) has been established to assist with the work of the
NEPC. Additionally, the NEPC
is responsible for the promotion of energy conservation and the management
of the Energy Conservation Promotion Fund as per the Energy Conservation
Promotion Act, B.E. 2535 (1992).
The
Organizational Structure of Thailand’s
Energy Sector
In October 2002,
pursuant to the Act on Organization of Ministries, Sub-Ministries and
Departments (2002), the Ministry of Energy was established.
Various energy-related agencies that used to be scattered under the
auspices of different ministries have been transferred to be under the
Ministry of Energy so that the energy management and the planning and
development of national energy programs, including regulation, will be
more streamlined.
The Departments under the Ministry of Energy and their responsibilities
are as follows:
1.
Office of the Minister
Responsible for and support the
Minister of Energy’s
political missions in coordination with the cabinet, the Parliament and
the general public; and coordinate the responses to queries, clarification
on motions, bills and other political-related issues.
2.
Office of the Permanent Secretary
Establish strategies and
translate policies of the Ministry into action plans; allocate the
resources and manage the manpower to achieve the targets and missions of
the Ministry; and coordinate international energy cooperation.
3.
Department of Mineral Fuels (DMF)
Promote and accelerate energy procurement via facilitating energy resource
exploration and development both in Thailand and abroad.
Regulate energy business via concession granting for exploration
and production of mineral fuels.
4.
Department of Energy Business (DOEB)
Regulate the energy quality and safety
standards, including impacts on the environment and security, and improve
the standards to protect consumers’
benefit.
5.
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDP)
Promote efficient use of energy, monitor
energy conservation activities and explore alternative energy sources, as
well as disseminate energy-related technologies.
6. Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO)
Recommend national energy
policies and planning; establish energy conservation measures and
framework for budget allocation for energy conservation promotion;
establish preventive and solution measures against oil shortage; and
coordinate and assess the outcome of policy implementation.
The State Enterprise under the Ministry of Energy comprises:
-
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT)
Note: The Metropolitan Electricity Authority
(MEA) and the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) under the Ministry of
Interior will be transferred to the Ministry of Energy in two years (as
from October 2002).
In addition, there are two Autonomous Public Companies under
the Ministry of Energy, namely:
1.
PTT Public Company Limited (PTT)
2.
Bangchak Petroleum Public Company Limited (BCP)
The implementation
of energy policies, however, intensively involves both directly and
indirectly other government agencies and the private sector.
Such agencies include:
·
Ministry
of Industry:
the Department of Mineral Resources and the Thai Industrial Standards
Institute.
·
Ministry
of Commerce:
the Department of Commercial Registration, the Department of Internal
Trade, the Department of Foreign Trade and the Department of Business
Development.
·
Ministry
of Defence: the
Defence Energy Department and the Royal Thai Navy.
·
Ministry
of Finance: the
Customs Department, the Excise Department, the Revenue Department, the
Comptroller-General’s
Department and the Fiscal Policy Office.
·
Office of
the Prime Minister:
the Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB),
the Office of the Consumer Protection Board, the Office of the Council of
State and the Royal Thai Police.
·
Ministry
of Transport:
the Department of Land Transport and the Department of Highways
·
Ministry
of Foreign Affairs:
the Department of Treaties and Legal Affairs.
·
Private
Sector Organizations and Institutions:
These will include academic and research institutions, oil corporations,
electricity and energy producers, energy importers and exporters, and
private enterprises related to energy and energy consumption.
Regulation
of the Energy Industry
The implementation of the liberalization and privatization plan of
the energy sector in Thailand is underway.
Simultaneously, the regulatory framework for the energy sector is
being reformed to clearly distinguish the role of the National Energy
Policy Council (NEPC), the energy policy-making authority, from the
regulatory duties. The
National Energy Regulatory Commission (NERC), an independent regulatory
agency under the Ministry of Energy, and a transparent regulatory
framework for the energy sector will be established under the new Energy
Industry Act. The regulatory
duties currently under the responsibilities of various departments of the
Ministry of Energy will be transferred to the NERC.
Currently, the
Energy Industry Bill is under review by the Office of the Council of
State; it is expected to be in force by the end of 2003.
The NERC is to regulate the electricity and gas supply industry,
including other energy-related activities as designated by relevant royal
decrees. To this effect, the
Commission shall be responsible for, among others, license issuance for
energy industry operation, regulation of tariff, standards and service
quality, promotion of competition and prevention of abusive use of
monopoly power, and protection of energy consumers, including addressing
consumers’
complaints.
Coal
Coal
Reserves
With participation of the private sector in coal mining since early
1980s, coal has played significant role as an alternative source of energy
for decades in Thailand. Through
the Mineral Act, mining practices are regulated and supervised by the
Department of Mineral Resources (DMR), Ministry of Industry.
The majority of coal found in Thailand has low calorific value and
is ranked as either lignite or sub-bituminous.
The output is all used domestically mainly as fuel in electricity
generation. As at the end of
2001, Thailand’s
coal reserve was estimated at 1,354 million tons.
The largest reserve of 1,211 million tons is located at the Mae Moh
basin belonging to the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT),
a state enterprise under the Ministry
of Energy. The
cumulative coal production at the end of 2001 was 264.8 million tons.
Mining
Leases
Coal mining leases in Thailand has been applied according to the
Mineral Act. As at the end of
2001, there are altogether 25 coal concessionaires, holding 146 tracts
throughout Thailand. A minimal
block of 300 rais (120 acres) will be awarded per mining tract.
Of these, more than half located in northern Thailand, such as,
Lampang, Lamphun, Chiang Mai, Phayao and Tak provinces.
Most of coal acreage belong to EGAT.
Currently, 12 coal mines are operational; 10 of which are in
northern Thailand and one each in the central and southern regions.
Coal
Production
History of coal production in Thailand dated back to 1955, when the
open-pit coal mine in Mae Moh basin started producing at an initial rate
of 22,118 tons per year. Coal
output steadily increased every year, with the highest record of 22.13
million tons in 1997.
The output of coal depends upon the market demand.
Following the1997 economic crisis, coal production in 2000 dropped
to 17.78 million tons. However,
the production in 2001 increased by approximately 10.2% to 19.60 million
tons. Apart from EGAT, there
are 12 private coal operators in Thailand.
However, only three operators –
EGAT and two private coal operators, i.e. Ban Pu and Lanna Lignite -- are
major coal producers, altogether representing over 90% of the total
production for years. In 2001,
EGAT excavated 78.8% of the whole output from Mae Moh basin.
Ban Pu and Lanna Lignite are major private coal companies, holding
shares of 13.4% and 5% respectively.
Imported
Coal
Since domestic coal has low calorific value, Thailand has to import
coal every year to fulfill industry needs, particularly bituminous coal
for cement industry. In 2001,
the volume of imported coal was about 4.9 million tons (18.2% higher than
that in 2000). Thailand
imported coal from Indonesia, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, China and Australia.
Thailand’s
Lignite/Coal Supply and Demand in 2001
|
|
2000
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
(Thousand
tons)
|
Growth
Rate
(%)
|
Share
(%)
|
|
Lignite
Production
|
17,786
|
19,607
|
10.2
|
100.0
|
|
EGAT
|
13,652
|
15,447
|
13.2
|
78.8
|
|
Private
Mines
|
4,134
|
4,160
|
0.6
|
21.2
|
|
-
Ban Pu
|
1,938
|
2,622
|
35.3
|
13.4
|
|
-
Lanna
|
1,123
|
979
|
-12.8
|
5.0
|
|
-
Others
|
1,073
|
559
|
-47.9
|
2.9
|
|
Coal
Import
|
4,183
|
4,945
|
18.2
|
|
|
Total
Supply
|
21,969
|
24,552
|
11.8
|
|
|
Lignite
Demand
|
17,551
|
19,935
|
13.6
|
100.0
|
|
Power
Production
|
14,121
|
15,744
|
11.5
|
79.0
|
|
Industry
|
3,430
|
4,190
|
22.2
|
21.0
|
|
Coal
Demand
|
4,183
|
4,945
|
18.2
|
100.0
|
|
Power
Production (SPP)
|
2,055
|
2,150
|
4.6
|
43.5
|
|
Industry
|
2,128
|
2,795
|
31.3
|
56.5
|
|
Total
Demand
|
21,734
|
24,880
|
14.5
|
|
Coal
Utilization
Utilization of domestic coal decreased in 1999 and 2000 due to the
impact of the 1997 economic crisis. However,
in 2001, the consumption increased by 13.6%, i.e. from 17.55 million tons
in 2000 to 19.9 million tons. The
largest portion, 79%, was used for power generation at EGAT’s
Mae Moh power plant. Next to
it was for cement manufacturing (14%); the rest was used as fuels in other
industries, such as paper mill, fiber factory, and tobacco curing.
Combined with the imported coal, the country’s
total coal consumption in 2001 was about 24 million tons.
Coal
Pricing
In general, coal pricing in Thailand is restricted mainly to
heating value. The most
acceptable heating value is at 5,000 kcal/kg.
At present domestic coal is purchased at 500 baht/ton at mine
mouth. Coal buyers will pay
bonus for additional heating value. On
the contrary, coal sellers must pay penalty in case of excessive emission
of ash and sulphur content. Transportation
cost of domestic coal is estimated about 340 baht/ton.
For coal import, both long-term contracts and spot-lot are
applicable. Long-term
contracts provide quality reliability and supply security.
Referring to JBP (Japanese benchmark price), the cost can be as
high as 28.75 US$/ton for 6,700 Kcal/kg coal at loading point.
Mostly used for Thailand, the spot-lot is advantageous in demand
fluctuation but weakly versus JBP. High
calorific coal (6400-6600 kcal/kg) costs about 30 US$/ton and 22 US$/ton
for medium calorific one (6000 Kcal/kg) at discharge port.
Oil:
Overview
The first-ever oil field in Thailand was found in Fang, Chiang Mai
province in the north of the country.
The Defence Energy Department, Ministry of Defence, has been
operating Fang oil field since 1963. On
26 March 1971 the first Petroleum Act was promulgated, and the first round
of petroleum concession bidding was announced on 13 September 1971,
resulting in the awarding of 9 concessions, altogether 22 blocks.
Up to 2001, 57 concessions with 92 blocks were already issued, but
only 25 concessions with 32 blocks were still held.
Crude oil production by concessionaires started up in 1982. The
aggregate sale volume at the end of 2001 was 177 million barrels (MMbbl).
Domestic oil development has greatly reduced Thailand’s
dependency on energy imports, from 98% of the country demand in 1980 to
63% in 2001. As of 31 December
2001, crude oil reserves were estimated at 806 MMbbl, of which 325 MMbbl
are proven reserves. Of the
total reserves, 219 MMbbl are onshore reserves, mainly at Sirikit Oil
Field in Kamphaeng Phet province, and 587 MMbbl are offshore reserves in
the Gulf of Thailand in such fields as Benchamas and Tantawan.
The oil industry in Thailand is dominated by PTT, formerly the
Petroleum Authority of Thailand. PTT
Exploration and Production (PTTEP) is the main upstream subsidiary of PTT.
Thai Oil, the country’s
largest refiner, is also managed by PTT.
In October 2001, PTT underwent a partial privatization, with about
30% of its equity sold in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET).
Oil:
Exploration
For oil exploration, the Defence Energy Department’s
Fang Oil Field has been in operation since 1963.
Its current production is about 1.2 thousand barrels per day (KBD).
With the discovery of crude oil at Sirikit Field in the central
plain in early 1980’s,
Thai Shell Exploration and Production Co., Ltd. has been producing crude
oil at a rate of 21 KBD.
As of
September 2001, the number of petroleum concessions in Thailand has
reached 25 concessions and 32 blocks, locating onshore (7
concessions/7blocks), in the Gulf of Thailand (17 concessions/24 blocks),
and Andaman Sea (1 concession/1 block).
This involves overall concession areas of exploration, production
and reserves of 76,639.9 km2, 5,264.8 km2, and
11,763.5 km2 respectively.
Among the private companies, Thai Shell Exploration and Production
Co., Ltd. has the biggest share of oil exploration and production.
The Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) of the Ministry of
Industry is in charge of petroleum exploration by granting concession
rights in petroleum exploration and production to private companies.
In 2001, the total crude oil production rate was 62 KBD, of which
29 KBD came from Benchamas Oil Field in the Gulf of Thailand (47% of the
domestic production) and 21 KBD from Sirikit Oil Field (34% of the
domestic production).
Crude
Oil Production in 2001 (by Resource)
|
|
|
2000
|
2001
|
|
|
Field
|
Operator
|
Volume
(bpd)
|
Volume
(bpd)
|
Share
(%)
|
|
1.
Sirikit
|
Thai
Shell
|
23,483
|
21,212
|
34.3
|
|
2.
Pru Krathiam
|
Thai
Shell
|
102
|
92
|
0.1
|
|
3.
Nong Tum
|
Thai
Shell
|
262
|
253
|
0.4
|
|
4.
Wat Taen
|
Thai
Shell
|
-
|
11
|
0.0
|
|
5.
Tantawan
|
Chevron
|
7,454
|
7,938
|
12.8
|
|
6.
Benchamas
|
Chevron
|
24,354
|
28,906
|
46.7
|
|
7.
Fang
|
Defense
Energy Dept.
|
878
|
658
|
1.1
|
|
8.
Neung (Kamphaeng Saen) & Song (U-Thong)
|
PTTEP
|
548
|
597
|
1.0
|
|
9.
Bung Ya & Bung Muang
|
SINO
US Petroleum (formerly North Central)
|
635
|
902
|
1.5
|
|
10.
Wichian Buri
|
Pacific
Tiger Energy
|
200
|
180
|
0.3
|
|
11.
Si Thep
|
Pacific
Tiger Energy
|
21
|
16
|
0.0
|
|
12.
Unocal*
|
Unocal
|
-
|
1,149
|
1.9
|
|
Total
|
|
57,937
|
61,914
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
* Unocal comprises the following fields: Plamuk, Kaphong, Surat and Yala
Petroleum
Producing Fields in 2001
|
Field
|
Operator
|
Output
Products
|
Onshore
|
|
|
|
Fang
and 6 satellite fields
|
Defence
Energy Department
|
Oil
|
|
Sirikit
and 7satellite fields
|
Thai
Shell E&P.
|
Oil
& Gas
|
|
Nam
Phong
|
Exxon
Mobil
|
Gas
|
|
Kamphaeng
Saen, U-Thong
|
PTTEP
International
|
Oil
|
|
Bung
Muang, Bung Ya
|
Sino
- U.S. Petroleum
|
Oil
|
|
Wichian
Buri, Si Thep
|
Pacific
Tiger Energy
|
Oil
|
Gulf
of Thailand
|
|
|
|
Erawan
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Condensate
|
|
Baanpot,
Satun, Platong
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Condensate
|
|
Funan,
Jakrawan, Gomin, Pladang
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Condensate
|
|
Trat,
Pailin
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Condensate
|
|
Kaphong
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Oil
|
|
Surat
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Oil
|
|
Plamuk
|
Unocal
Thailand
|
Gas
& Oil
|
|
Bangkot
|
PTTEP
|
Gas
& Condensate
|
|
Tantawan,
Benchamas, Maliwan
|
Chevron
|
Oil
& gas
|
|
Na
Sanun
|
Pacific
Tiger
|
Oil
|
|
Nang
Nuan-A, Nang Nuan-B
|
Thai
Shell E&P
|
Oil
|
Oil
Import
Compared with the domestic demand, the production of crude oil from
indigenous resources was very low; therefore, there was a need to import
crude oil at a high rate of 90% of the total crude oil demand.
In 2001, the total import crude oil was 712 KBD, an increase by
5.5% from 2000 due to the increasing demand.
Oil import to Thailand mainly
comes from the Middle East, sharing 77% of the total oil import.
Oil exporting countries in Southeast Asia, especially Malaysia and
Brunei, have recently become important oil suppliers for Thailand.
Thailand’s
Oil Import in 2001
|
Exporting
Country
|
Million
Litres
|
Share
%
|
|
UAE
|
9,072
|
22.0
|
|
Oman
|
7,942
|
19.2
|
|
Yemen
|
4,582
|
11.1
|
|
Saudi
Arabia
|
6,149
|
14.9
|
|
Malaysia
|
3,677
|
8.9
|
|
Brunei
|
2,977
|
7.2
|
|
Kuwait
|
1,739
|
4.2
|
|
Qatar
|
1,362
|
3.3
|
|
Iraq
|
608
|
1.5
|
|
Australia
|
555
|
1.3
|
|
Indonesia
|
505
|
1.2
|
|
Vietnam
|
372
|
0.9
|
|
Others
|
1,789
|
4.3
|
|
TOTAL
|
41,329
|
100.0
|
Oil
Refining
As for the oil refining
industry, there are currently eight oil refineries in Thailand, with a
total capacity of 994.5 thousand barrels per day (KBD) in 2001.
They are: the TPI Refinery, Thai Oil Company (49% of which is owned
by PTT), Esso Refinery, Rayong Refinery Co., Ltd., Star Petroleum Refinery
Co., Ltd., Bangchak Petroleum Public Co., Ltd. (BCP), Rayong Purifier, and
Fang Refinery.
Thailand’s
Oil Refining Capacity in 2001
Unit:
Thousand Barrels per Day (KBD)
Refinery
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
|
1.
TPI
|
65
|
65
|
215
|
|
2.
Thai Oil
|
210
|
210
|
210
|
|
3.
Esso
|
145
|
145
|
145
|
|
4.
Rayong Refinery
|
145
|
145
|
145
|
|
5.
Star Refinery
|
145
|
145
|
145
|
|
6.
Bangchak
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
|
7.
Rayong Purifier
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
|
8.
Fang
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
|
Total
|
844.5
|
844.5
|
994.5
|
In 2001, the total petroleum products from refineries comprised
diesel (43%), gasoline (21%), fuel oil (17%), jet fuel (11%), LPG (7%) and
kerosene (1%).
Oil:
Market and Price Structure
Thailand’s
petroleum market is dominated by five major oil companies.
Listed in descending order of market shares, they are:
|
No.
|
Company
|
Share
(%)
|
Company
Status
|
|
1.
|
PTT
|
30.08
|
Autonomous
public company under the Ministry of Energy
|
|
2.
|
SHELL
|
15.09
|
Foreign
owned
|
|
3.
|
ESSO
|
12.85
|
Foreign
owned
|
|
4.
|
CALTEX
|
8.82
|
Foreign
owned
|
|
5.
|
Bangchak
|
8.14
|
Autonomous
public company under the Ministry of Energy
|
|
|
TPI
& Others
|
25.02
|
|
|
|
Total
|
100
|
|
Altogether they hold about 75% of the petroleum product market.
These major
oil companies also own retail service stations located in all regions of
the country. Besides, a large
number of jobbers (wholesalers), transporters, retail dealers and major
consumers also play an important role in the oil business in Thailand.
In the past, the government tightly controlled oil pricing at all
transaction stages. Ex-refinery
and import prices were determined by the government based on Singapore
posting and spot prices. The
government also set the marketing margin and retail prices, which rarely
changed since the marketing margin and retail price adjustment was a
politically sensitive issue. Excise
and municipal taxes were imposed on a specific basis (Baht/litre).
The Oil Fund levy/subsidy acted as stabilizer of retail prices.
Prices of imported oil were also controlled in the same manner.
Retail
Price = Ex-Refinery/Import Price + Oil Fund + Taxes + Marketing Margin
The oil market in Thailand has been fully deregulated since 19
August 1991. The current oil
pricing system allows prices to fluctuate according to the changing market
forces and state of competition. The
government abolished determination of ex-refinery/import and wholesale
prices. Refineries would
announce their ex-refinery prices sold to oil traders and those sold to
small customers. An import
levy was imposed to protect domestic refineries.
This was later followed by changes in oil reserve regulations to
further increase protection.
With the government deregulation
of the oil market, other oil companies have entered the Thai petroleum
market, which helps intensify the domestic competition.
These include Mobil Oil Thailand Ltd., BP Oil (Thailand) Ltd.,
Kuwait Petroleum (Thailand) Ltd., and Conoco (Thailand) Ltd.
Oil price control was repealed in August 1991, except for liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG).
Presently, the oil pricing should, in principle, be fully
deregulated, but certain monitoring is still necessary.
For example, oil traders are still encouraged to determine prices
at their service stations. The
government, via the Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO) of the
Ministry of Energy, still issues “transport
cost account”
as guidelines for oil companies to determine prices in each district.
EPPO and the Internal Trade Department, Ministry of Commerce,
closely monitor prices and market conditions.
Warning will be issued from time to time for oil traders to reduce
the marketing margin.
Price
Structure of Petroleum Products in Bangkok
(2
March 2003: Exchange Rate: 42.79 Baht/US$)
Unit:
Baht/litre
|
|
Gasoline
95
RON
|
Gasoline
91
RON
|
High
Speed
Diesel
|
|
Ex-refinery
|
11.7121
|
11.2144
|
11.3034
|
|
Excise
Tax
|
3.6850
|
3.6850
|
2.3050
|
|
Municipal
Tax
|
0.3685
|
0.3685
|
0.2305
|
|
Oil
Fund
|
-1.4738
|
-1.9065
|
-1.1065
|
|
Energy
Conservation Promotion Fund
|
0.0400
|
0.0400
|
0.0400
|
|
Wholesale Price
|
14.3318
|
13.4014
|
12.7724
|
|
VAT
|
1.0032
|
0.9381
|
0.8941
|
|
Marketing
Margin
|
1.5467
|
1.5425
|
1.0500
|
|
VAT
|
0.1083
|
0.1080
|
0.0735
|
|
Retail
Price
|
16.99
|
15.99
|
14.79
|
There have been apparent changes after the oil market deregulation.
Initially the marketing margin was more than doubled but the
refining margin declined substantially.
The numbers of oil traders and service stations have considerably
increased; hence the number of districts with no service stations have
declined. With more players in
the market, service quality has significantly improved, and this has
greatly facilitated improvement of oil quality for environmental
protection. In addition,
remote areas are served by a new breed of small-scale service stations.
Domestic refining capacity rises substantially and surplus capacity
began to emerge in 1996.
Since 1999, there has been intense competition in the oil market
due to surplus refining capacity, large number of traders and service
stations and consumers’
sensitivity to price differentials. Surplus
refining capacity in gasoline and diesel has exerted pressure on the
ex-refinery price to shift from “FOB
Singapore + Transport Cost”
to “FOB
Singapore –
Transport Cost.”
Brand loyalty is disappearing rapidly as consumers regard oil sold
by all traders as the same commodity; instead, price becomes the most
influential factor for consumers’
choice, followed by service quality. Accordingly,
there has been further improvement in service quality and promotion
programs by oil companies. Unprofitable
service stations have been closing down.
Market
Shares and Number of Gas Stations
|
|
|
Market
Shares (%)
|
|
|
No.
of Gas Stations
|
|
|
Company
|
1991
|
1994
|
1997
|
2002
(7mths)
|
1991
|
1994
|
1997
|
2002
(Q2)
|
|
1.
PTT
|
34
|
36
|
36
|
30
|
967
|
1,290
|
1,498
|
1,414
|
|
2.
Shell
|
22
|
19
|
15
|
15
|
896
|
991
|
1,040
|
690
|
|
3.
ESSO
|
23
|
19
|
16
|
13
|
711
|
811
|
871
|
682
|
|
4.
Caltex
|
11
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
513
|
589
|
598
|
514
|
|
5.
BCP
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
23
|
659
|
1,187
|
1,073
|
|
6-29
Others
|
8
|
12
|
18
|
25
|
375
|
1,425
|
7,014
|
12,333
|
|
TOTAL
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
3,475
|
5,765
|
12,208
|
16,706
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas and Condensate
In Thailand, natural gas was first developed from Erawan gas field
in 1981. About 94% of natural
gas and condensate are found offshore in the Gulf of Thailand in the
Unocal concession and Bongkot field of PTTEP.
As of 31 December 2001, their proven reserves, comprising 37 fields
offshore and 6 fields onshore, were estimated at 13,340.83 billion cubic
feet (bcf) of natural gas and 257.46 million barrels (MMbbl) of
condensate.
In 2001, natural gas production in Thailand amounted to 1,900
million cubic feet per day (MMscfd) by five operating companies, namely
Unocal Thailand Ltd., PTTEP Public Company Ltd., Chevron Offshore
(Thailand) Ltd., Esso Exploration and Production Khorat Inc., and Thai
Shell Exploration and Production Co., Ltd.
The largest natural gas field is Bongkot, with a production of 584
MMscfd (31% of the total production in 2001).
The largest natural gas producer, Unocal, produced 1,029 MMscfd of
natural gas and 35,524 barrels of condensate per day (bcd).
Natural
Gas Production in 2001
Unit:
MMscfd
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
Producer
|
Volume
|
Share(%)
|
|
Domestic
Production
|
|
1,900
|
79.3
|
|
Gulf
of Thailand
|
|
1,783
|
74.4
|
|
Erawan
|
Unocal
|
266
|
11.1
|
|
Pailin
|
Unocal
|
212
|
8.8
|
|
Funan
& Jakrawan
|
Unocal
|
199
|
8.3
|
|
Satun
|
Unocal
|
118
|
4.9
|
|
Kaphong
& Platong
|
Unocal
|
48
|
2.0
|
|
Others
(7 fields)
|
Unocal
|
186
|
7.8
|
|
Bongkot
|
PTT
E&P
|
584
|
24.4
|
|
Tantawan
|
Chevron
|
52
|
2.2
|
|
Benchamas
|
Chevron
|
118
|
4.9
|
|
On-shore
|
|
117
|
4.9
|
|
Nam
Phong
|
Esso
|
60
|
2.5
|
|
Sirikit
|
Thai
Shell
|
57
|
2.4
|
|
Import
|
|
496
|
20.7
|
|
Yadana
|
Myanmar
|
377
|
15.7
|
|
Yetagun
|
Myanmar
|
119
|
4.0
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
2,396
|
100
|
| |
|
|
|
|
With insufficient domestic supply to meet the increasing demand,
Thailand has explored joint petroleum resource development with
neighboring countries. The
PTTEP has made investment in Myanmar.
Natural gas import from Yadana field commenced with a volume of 2
MMscfd in 1998 and substantially increased to 128 MMscfd in 2000 when the
natural gas-fired Ratchaburi Power Plant in Thailand commenced operation
in October 2000. Another 36
MMscfd was imported from the Yetagun gas field of Myanmar later the year.
In 2001, the natural gas import from Myanmar reached 496 MMscfd.
Additionally, a Joint Development Authority has been established
with Malaysia to develop natural gas resources in the Thailand-Malaysia
Joint Development Area (JDA), an area in the Gulf of Thailand claimed by
both Thailand and Malaysia.
Since Thailand has a policy to promote the use of natural gas
instead of fuel oil in electricity generation as well as in the industrial
and transport sectors, all produced natural gas is used domestically.
In 2001, 78.4% of the total gas supply was used for power
generation and the remaining 23.9 was used as fuel in the industrial
sector and others.
So far, PTT has been the sole purchaser, supplier and transporter
of natural gas. To introduce
greater competition into the natural gas supply industry, PTT was
corporatized in October 2001. In
the future, PTT
Transmission Co., Ltd. and PTT Distribution Co., Ltd. will be formed as
separate legal entities with PTT retaining 100% ownership.
The transportation of natural gas, like the transmission and
distribution of electricity, is naturally monopolistic and hence the
pipeline tariff will be subject to regulation, generally using cost of
service basis.
As of 30 June 2001, Thailand had a pipeline transmission network of
approximately 2,390 kilometers, of which 1,359 kilometers are offshore and
1,031 kilometers onshore, with a total capacity of about 3,170 MMscfd.
The onshore pipeline in western Thailand receives gas from the
Yadana and Yetagun fields to Ratchaburi power plant whereas the onshore
pipeline in eastern Thailand provides gas to industrial estates and power
producers in the eastern and central regions of Thailand.
On 25 September 2001, the government approved PTT’s
Gas Pipeline Master Plan No. 3 (2002-2010), comprising six pipeline
construction projects and two gas compressor construction/installation
projects to increase natural gas transmission capacity.
According to the Master Plan, the pipeline transmission network
capacity will increase by 7,523 MMscfd.
With regard to the price structure, natural gas producer prices are
based on negotiation between PTT and the producers.
The price formula is related to five parameters: the wholesale
price index (25-30%), the price of medium-fuel oil (Mfo) ex-Singapore
(15-40%), the US index of export prices (20-30%), the US producer price
index for oil field machinery and tools (20-25%), and the exchange rate of
Thai Baht vs US dollar. Consumer
price is based on the producer prices plus marketing margin and
transmission tariffs.
Liquefied
Petroleum Gas (LPG)
In 2001, the total LPG production was about 3.2 million tons, 76%
of which was for domestic consumption and the remaining 24% was exported.
PTT gas separation plant was the largest producer.
The shares of LPG consumption for cooking, industry and automobiles
and as feedstock were 60%, 14%, 10% and 16%, respectively.
LPG
Demand-Supply Balance in 2001
|
|
Volume
(Thousand
Tons)
|
Share
(%)
|
|
Production
|
3,183
|
100
|
|
PTT
GSP
|
1,429
|
45
|
|
Shell
GSP
|
110
|
3.5
|
|
7
refineries
|
1,480
|
46.5
|
|
Others
|
164
|
5
|
|
Demand
|
2,400
|
76
|
|
Cooking
|
1,430
|
60
|
|
Industry
|
335
|
14
|
|
Automobile
|
254
|
10
|
|
Feedstock
|
381
|
16
|
|
Export
|
758
|
24
|
At the retail level, there are seven major LPG traders, with PTT
holding the largest market share.
Market
Shares of Major LPG Traders in Thailand
Unit:
%
|
|
2001
|
2002
(7
months)
|
|
PTT
|
46
|
44
|
|
Siam
Gas
|
14
|
15
|
|
Unique
Gas
|
15
|
14
|
|
World
Gas
|
14
|
15
|
|
Union
Gas
|
9
|
9
|
|
Caltex
LPG
|
2
|
2
|
|
Sang
Thong
|
0.1
|
1
|
|
|
100
|
100
|
In the past, LPG prices were controlled in the same way as other
oil products. Ex-refinery/import
prices were initially determined by CIF price of Singapore posting and/or
contracted price of Saudi Arabia. Once
Thailand became a net exporter of LPG, prices were based (sometimes) on
export parity. Oil Fund levy
was used to stabilize retail prices. In
1986 the “uniform
pricing”
system was introduced; wholesale prices at PTT’s
5 depots throughout the country were the same through subsidization from
the Oil Fund for “storage
cost”
at the depots and “transport
cost”
from Sriracha (site of PTT’s
main LPG terminal). Prices at
other locations were marked up by transport cost from nearest major
distribution centres.
Before 1991, subsidy levels were different for different uses of
LPG in order to help low-income consumers in the household and
automobile/industrial sectors. This
had led to illegal practices in the LPG business, e.g. illegal transfer of
LPG from small cylinders (13-15 kg) to large cylinders (48-50 kg) and
automotive uses causing fire hazard. Therefore,
the different subsidies were later replaced by the same subsidy
irrespective of use, and the retail price control for automotive and
industrial LPG was lifted in 1991. However,
heavy subsidies from the Oil Fund led to increasing levy on gasoline and
diesel, thereby further creating price distortion.
Currently, the LPG market in Thailand is being reformed with a view
to achieving a fully competitive market, in terms of both quantity and
pricing. In recent years, the
government has gradually reduced uniform pricing with an aim to finally
abolish it and create competition instead.
The marketing margin, which was kept constant for many years in the
past, has increased. Subsidy
by the Oil Fund has been reduced by adjusting retail prices, and subsidy
of “storage
cost”
for LPG terminal has been abolished. The
existing LPG pricing system in Thailand is “semi-floated,”
that is, only the wholesale prices are regulated.
Retail LPG prices have been floated since 1 November 2001.
However, the government has a policy to fully deregulate LPG
prices. During the transition
period, several measures have been undertaken to improve the LPG trading
system and safety standards. These
measures include elimination of illegal LPG filling; LPG traders have been
required to be responsible for LPG filling and LPG cylinders under their
respective trademarks since 2001. Another
measure is to remove from the market all illegal LPG cylinders and “white
cylinders”
(cylinders that do not belong to LPG traders and hence have not undergone
regular maintenance); the implementation of this measure was completed at
the end of 2002. During 2003,
LPG traders will be required to speed up the maintenance of LPG cylinders
under their respective trademarks. In
addition, stringent surveillance will be administered to ensure that LPG
traders strictly abide by relevant regulations.
It is expected by the year 2006 the LPG market in Thailand will be
fully deregulated and will be operated with internationally accepted
standards of trading system and safety.
LPG
Traders, Filling Plants and Retail Shops
|
LPG
Traders,
as at November 2001:
|
|
|
1.
PTT Plc.
|
Autonomous
public company, under the Ministry of Energy
|
|
2.
Unique Gas and Petrochemicals Plc.
|
Domestic
company
|
|
3.
Siam Gas Industries Co., Ltd.
|
Domestic
company
|
|
4.
World Gas (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
|
Domestic
company
|
|
5.
Union Gas and Chemicals Co., Ltd.
|
Domestic
company
|
|
6.
Sang Thong Factory LPG Container Co., Ltd.
|
Domestic
company
|
|
7.
Caltex (Thai) Co., Ltd.
|
Foreign-owned
company
|
|
|
|
|
LPG
Filling Plants,
as of December 2001
|
|
|
360
LPG filling plants, nationwide
|
|
|
LPG
Retail Shops,
as of October 2001
|
|
|
About
1,488 LPG retail shops, nationwide
|
|
Power:
Overview
The electricity supply industry (ESI) is a major public utility of
the country. As of December
2002, Thailand’s
installed electricity generating capacity was 24,301 MW.
Until recently, the public sector, via the following three
concerned state-owned enterprises, had been the only operator of the
industry:
·
Electricity
Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) –
the power producer and supplier, selling electricity via high-voltage
transmission lines to
the Metropolitan Electricity Authority and the Provincial Electricity
Authority.
·
Metropolitan
Electricity Authority (MEA) –
the power distributor for consumers in Bangkok, Nonthaburi and Samut
Prakarn provinces.
·
Provincial
Electricity Authority (PEA) –
the power distributor for consumers in the remaining areas of the country.
Following
the above boundaries of responsibility, consumers in the MEA service areas
have to buy electricity only from the MEA.
Similarly, those in the PEA service areas have to buy electricity
only from the PEA. Therefore,
it can be summarized that the current electricity supply and service
systems are operated in quite a monopolistic manner.
The plan for restructuring and privatization of the electricity
supply industry, which is now being implemented, aims at promoting more
competition in the industry and, simultaneously, mobilizing the private
sector investment and shareholding in the ESI.
The underlying principle is to deregulate the industry wherever
possible to encourage competition. For
certain natural monopoly businesses, like power transmission and
distribution lines for which investment in construction of new lines or
poling would duplicate the existing ones and hence would not be
cost-effective, they will be subject to strict regulation with a view to
protecting consumers’
benefits.
Power:
Generation
From the mentioned ESI structure, it can be said that almost all
generation activities are handled by EGAT.
However, the government has opened access for the private sector to
participate in the generation business in the form of Small Power
Producers (SPPs) and Independent Power Producers (IPPs).
Both SPPs and IPPs will generate electricity and sell to EGAT, who
will further sell the electricity to the MEA and PEA.
A Small Power Producer (SPP) means a power project that produces
electricity using the co-generation (thermal and electricity) system or
using renewable energy, such as waste or residues from agricultural
activities, garbage, biogas, solar energy, as fuel, which will contribute
to more efficient use of domestic energy resources.
An Independent Power Producer (IPP) is a power producer in the
private sector, with a large generating
capacity, using commercial energy (excluding nuclear) as fuel, such as
natural gas, coal (both indigenous and imported) and orimulsion.
Thailand |